Have you been Charged with a Road Traffic Offence in Mornington?
If you’ve been charged with a road traffic offence in Mornington, Dribbin & Brown Traffic Lawyers can assist. We regularly appear at both the Frankston
Drink Driving – Charges – Fines – Lawyers Melbourne
DRINK DRIVING Charge, Fines, Lawyers Melbourne Dribbin & Brown Criminal Lawyers, only practice in Criminal & Traffic Law. Don’t take risks with your livelihood, future
Caught Drink – Drug Driving
WHY YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE IF YOU’VE BEEN CAUGHT DRINK- DRUG DRIVING Introduction Drink or drug driving charges are the most commonly issued charges by
Professional Drivers Drug Driving
PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS CAUGHT DRUG DRIVING Introduction While drug related problems can arise in any industry, it has been found to be a particular issue amongst
Drink and Drug Driving
DRINK AND DRUG DRIVING – CASE STUDY Introduction Both drink driving and drug driving are serious offences and the laws are enforced very strictly by
Choosing a Drink Driving Lawyer if you have been charged Drink Driving
CHOOSING A DRINK DRIVING LAWYER IF YOU HAVE BEEN CHARGED DRINK DRIVING Introduction Victoria Police conduct between 3.5 and 4 million random breath tests every
Drink Driving Lawyers Melbourne – Law
DRINK DRIVING LAW AMENDMENT -VICTORIA Introduction Victorian magistrates take drink driving matters very seriously. So do County Court and Supreme Court judges dealing with culpable
Drink Driving Heidelberg
Charges: Exceed Prescribed Content of alcohol both section 49(1)(b) & (f), being a reading of .074. Alternative to be withdrawn.
Fail to Nominate Driver; Dangerous Driving
Charges: Fail to Nominate Driver section 60 Road Safety Act (RSA); Dangerous Driving section 64 RSA; Careless Driving section 65 RSA (3 demerit points); Improper
Fail to Nominate Driver
Charges: Fail to Nominate Driver when requested to do so by a police member acting in the execution of their duties. Section 60 of the
Drink Driving Frankston
Drink Driving Frankston Charges: Drink Driving (BAC 0.074) section 49(1)(f) and s49(1)(b) of the Road Safety Act (Driving within 3 hours exceeding prescribed content of alcohol)
Fail to Remain at the Scene of an Accident
Charges: Fail to Remain at the Scene of an Accident section 61(1)(a) Road Safety Act (RSA), Fail to Exchange details s61(1)(c) RSA; Careless Drive section
Driving Whilst Suspended Carrum
Charges: Driving Whilst Suspended s30(1) Road Safety Act 1986, second offence.
Driving Disqualified Moorabbin
Charges: The client was charged in the Moorabbin Justice Centre with Driving Whilst Disqualified. We abridged the matter to Frankston Magistrates Court, for a plea of guilty.
Licence Restoration Application
Facts: The client was applying to the Frankston Magistrates’ Court to become relicenced. The client had four prior offences relating to drink driving. In all cases
Fail to Stop at Accident
Charges: Fail to Stop Following Accident where Person Seriously Injured Section 61(3) of the Road Safety Act; Fail to Render Assistance where Person Seriously Injured;
Improper Use of Motor Vehicle
Improper Use of Motor Vehicle Charges: The client was charged with Careless Driving section 65 of the Road Safety Act, Fail to have proper control
Exceed Prescribed Content of Alcohol
Exceed Prescribed Content of Alcohol Charges: Driving Under the Influence, Exceed the Prescribed Content of Alcohol Whilst Driving reading at .22 section 49(1)(b) & (f).
Drink Driving Frankston Magistrates Court
Drink Driving Frankston Magistrates Court Charges: Driving Under the Influence; Exceed Prescribed Content of Alcohol (Drink Driving .186) Facts: The client worked in the hospitality
Driving Whilst Disqualified Not Guilty
Charges: Driving Whilst Disqualified, Drink Driving by Exceeding the PCA (prescribed content of alcohol) reading at 0.12. Facts: The client had been to Court two and a
